Thursday, September 20, 2012

The Autobiography of Malcolm X - Foreshadowing Evil

The Autobiography of Malcolm X
Author: Malcolm X, as told to Alex Haley

The main thing you got to remember is that everything in the world is a hustle. –Freddie, the shoeshine boy

As I see it today, the ability to read awoke inside me some long dormant craving to be mentally alive. –Narrator

I wouldn't have considered it possible for me to love any woman. I'd had too much experience that women were only tricky, deceitful, untrustworthy flesh. I had seen too many men ruined, or at least tied down, or in some other way messed up by women. Women talked too much. To tell a woman not to talk too much was like telling Jesse James not to carry a gun, or telling a hen not to cackle. –Narrator

Awareness came surging up in me – how deeply the religion of Islam had reached down into the mud to lift me up, to save me from being what I inevitably would have been: a dead criminal in a grave, or, if still alive, a flint-hard, bitter, thirty-seven-year-old convict in some penitentiary, or insane asylum. –Narrator

First, let's get the book description out of the way (copied from the back of the copy I borrowed from the library):
If there was any one man who articulated the anger, the struggle, and the beliefs of African Americans in the 1960s, that man was Malcolm X. His Autobiography is now an established classic of modern America, a book that expresses like none other the crucial truth about our violent times.
Second, let's establish the fact that I'm white; I am not African American… and I'm a woman. Those two facts should tell you something about my reaction to the first two thirds of this book if you've read it. Malcolm X, until his trip to Mecca, preached on the evils of the white man. And not just SOME white men, but ALL white men. Being born white meant that I was evil before I had my first thought, shed my first tear or screamed that first scream. And my being a woman… well, see his quote above about how all we do is bring down any man we get our hooks into.

I want to break this book down into three (uneven in length) sections: Detroit Red, Malcolm X and El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. The first section focuses on Malcolm's delinquent and drug-fueled adolescence. This part of the story was surprising and fairly enjoyable despite the unending foreshadowing, which I'll address later in this post. I knew very little about Malcolm X going into this reading and I learned that he was fully immersed into the Harlem drug and music culture. He gambled and thieved; cops hated him and he hated them. He survived on marijuana, cocaine and alcohol. I'll admit to being impressed that someone with such a seedy background grew to be such a prominent figure in an entire culture's history.

From Detroit Red, we move on to Malcolm X. This is where I started to get peeved at the book. I realize that it wasn't really written for a 30-year-old white woman in the 2010s to read; remembering this is what got me through the pages. Because in this section, Malcolm X expounds on the evil of the white man, the "history" of the white man's initial existence on the planet and the insignificance of the woman. His turn to Islam while in prison is clearly what saved his life – religion is powerful that way – and for this, I applaud his family for introducing it to him. However, as a human being, I do wish the religion hadn't been so hateful in its doctrine where non-African American people were concerned. I can't imagine the turmoil of those times when Malcolm X's preaching was at a controversial high, but I can understand why so many people were appalled at what he had to say.

I was near the end of my patience with his hatred by the time I got to the section I call El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. In this section, Malcolm takes his trip to Mecca, and – hallelujah – learns the truths about the Islamic religion. It is a religion more of peace than hatred, of brotherhood than segregation, of spiritualism than war. In Egypt and Jeddah and Mecca itself, Malcolm is met with and welcomed by people of all colors, races and languages, and he begins to understand the differences in between Sunni Islam (which he came to know overseas) and The Nation of Islam (which he left behind in America). He returns from his Hajj with a better sense of internal peace, though he faced a tough crowd of confused and angry followers. The leader of the Nation of Islam, Elijah Muhammad, was none too happy to be opposed and many men were tasked with taking Malcolm's life at his command.

In the end, I'm glad I finished reading… if I'd given up during the Malcolm X section, I never would have learned how he became a great leader and a civil rights activist, working with – instead of in opposition to – other activists of his day. I would have continued thinking that he was a hateful man preaching black supremacy and the evil of the white man. 

Before I conclude this post, I can't help but write about the thing that annoyed me more than the  Malcolm X's hate preaching. Nearly one out of every three paragraphs in this book used a very elementary and obvious form of foreshadowing. I can't tell you how many times I read things like, "I'd soon find out how wrong I was" or "Little did I know how true those words were" or "I didn't know then how important that moment would be." And it just got old. I like foreshadowing as much as the next literature lover, but subtlety is the key to effective foreshadowing. All this served to do was add ammunition to the argument that I should stop reading the book immediately. I don't know whether this was Malcolm X's storytelling style or a technique employed by Alex Haley. All I know is that I did not like it.

My takeaway: Religion – even if it's not the religion in which I've chosen to put my faith – has the power to save a life otherwise destined for prison or death on the streets and turn it into a life dedicated to human rights and civil liberties. And overusing a literary device lessens its effectiveness and annoys the reader, a fact which I'd soon find out to be truer than I'd ever thought before.

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

28 Days - Predictably Enjoyable


28 Days
Director: Betty Thomas

Gwen, you make it impossible to love you. –Lily

Man, this is not a way to live. This is a way to die. –Cornell

I don't need any more stories; I have enough stories. I would like a life. –Gwen

Don't drink, go to meetings, find a sponsor, ask for help. –Daniel

Don't ever be someone's slogan, because you are poetry. –Gwen

Even the pain in the ass needs someone to take care of them. I didn't do that… I didn't, and I should have. –Lilly

With as many stars as this movie has in it – not least among them is Sandra Bullock, of whom I'm a fan – I'm really surprised it never made it into my Netflix lineup prior to this project. And as far as casting goes, it's chock full of good and great actors who play the smaller roles quite well! Viggo Mortensen (yep, Aragorn), Azura Skye (who, oddly, I remember most as Jane in an old TV show Zoe, Duncan, Jack & Jane), Steve Buscemi (he's been in so many movies, yet sadly the first mental image of him I have is of his putting on lipstick at the end of Billy Madison; sorry, Steve), Elizabeth Perkins (seeing her makes me want to re-watch Indian Summer), Alan Tudyk (Steve the Pirate), Mike O’Malley (unfortunately no matter what he does, he will always live in my mind as the host of Nickelodeon’s Guts and Global Guts)…

Let's see what Netflix.com has to say:
After her drunken antics ruin her sister's wedding and result in major property damage, journalist Gwen Cummings enters rehab, where she runs afoul of the program director – and soon meets a fellow resident who changes her outlook.
This movie does a pretty good job of delivering a good message about overcoming your worldly demons by dealing with your inner ones. Predictable though it is – did you really think Gwen wouldn't be able to lift the horse's leg in the end? or that she wouldn't overcome her addictions, both to alcohol and pills and to her destructive boyfriend-turned-fiancĂ©? – the predictability doesn't get in the way of entertainment. And the writers, seemingly aware enough of the possibility of a predictable plot leading to a bored viewer, added a few unexpected moments to keep the plot from stalling out.

The story revolves around Gwen Cummings and her court-mandated trip to rehab to overcome her alcohol and pill abuse. While she ultimately is successful (see previous paragraph on predictability), she has a relapse or two and nearly gets kicked out of the facility. One of Gwen's biggest problems – drinking and drugs aside, of course – is that she never asks for help. This comes up several times in the movie. Cornell notices it and eventually Gwen herself even admits it to her sister. And it's when she finally shouts it out on a New York street that she's able to get the horse to lift its hoof. That moment leads her to leave Jasper and it seems that it's at that moment that she knows she can make it outside of rehab.

This is a good movie with a great cast – l laughed at times and will admit to tearing up when Lily and Gwen talked it out near the end. Did this movie change my life? No. Do I think it's Sandra Bullock's best film? No. Would I watch it again? Most definitely!

My takeaway: Sometimes it's the internal conflicts that need to be resolved before the external addictions can be rehabbed. And horses are much more intuitive (and stubborn) than I thought.

Friday, September 7, 2012

The Stand - Captain Tripps Kills the Climax


The Stand
Author: Stephen King

The place where you made your stand never mattered. Only that you were there... and still on your feet. –Narrator

I'm going to see him in Heaven. Tom Cullen is going to see him there, and he'll be able to talk and I'll be able to think. –Tom Cullen

No one can tell what goes on in between the person you were and the person you become. No one can chart that blue and lonely section of hell. There are no maps of the change. You just… come out the other side. Or you don't. 
–Larry Underwood, internally

Show me a man or a woman alone and I'll show you a saint. Give me two and they'll fall in love. Give me three and they'll invent the charming thing we call 'society.' Give me four and they'll build a pyramid. Give me five and they'll make one an outcast. Give me six and they'll reinvent prejudice. Give me seven and in seven years they'll reinvent warfare. Man may have been made in the image of God, but human society was made in the image of His opposite number, and is always trying to get back home. –Glen Bateman

Amazon.com's book description for The Stand:
Stephen King's apocalyptic vision of a world blasted by plague and tangled in an elemental struggle between good and evil remains as riveting and eerily plausible as when it was first published.
A patient escapes from a biological testing facility, unknowingly carrying a deadly weapon: a mutated strain of super-flu that will wipe out 99 percent of the world's population within a few weeks. Those who remain are scared, bewildered, and in need of a leader. Two emerge—Mother Abagail, the benevolent 108-year-old woman who urges them to build a peaceful community in Boulder, Colorado; and Randall Flagg, the nefarious "Dark Man," who delights in chaos and violence. As the dark man and the peaceful woman gather power, the survivors will have to choose between them—and ultimately decide the fate of all humanity.
This was my first Stephen King novel (though to be honest, I used an audiobook for this one). I've seen several of his movies and have listened to him read one of his short stories. But until I listened to The Stand, I'd never experienced one of his novels. I want to make that clear before I start talking about my experience with this book; I don't know if this is his typical style or something out of the ordinary for him.

Overall, I enjoyed the story. I thought there was a lot of good and well-thought-out turmoil both amongst and inside the characters. I liked that some of them struggled with their decision to go to the light or dark sides, and I liked that many of them didn't struggle at all. I liked that King made some of the "bad" characters rather likeable or at the very least, pitiable.

What I didn't like about the book was the climax. I thought there was such great character development and lead-up that when the men actually made it to Las Vegas to confront the Dark Man – to have their stand, in essence – I felt disappointed by the sudden and quick destruction of all the hard work that went into getting this scene set up. I felt let down, really. And it wasn't the deaths of so many characters – on both sides – that left me empty. I expected death, for how can you have war without death? For me, the scene where Flagg is preparing to publicly quarter the Boulder Free Zone ambassadors, where men are beginning to question their decision to side with Flagg, where Larry and Ralph are awaiting their fate, ready to accept death, should have been something bigger than it was. Or rather, it should have gone on longer or had more meat. I just felt that once the bomb exploded and killed everyone, it was just… whelp, it's over!

The reincarnation of Flagg, both in physical form on an island and in spiritual form in Stu's dreams and premonitions, made me feel a bit better about the way Las Vegas went down. I like the message that evil can never truly be wiped out; it can be only momentarily repressed and re-positioned. And I like the reappearance of Nick to Tom, reinforcing his childlike faith: "The Lord is my Shepherd… I shall not want for nothing." His faith allowed God to work through an apparition of Nick to heal Stu and lead them back to Boulder.

This book really is a story of good vs evil, light vs dark, hero vs villain, God vs Satan (depending on your amount of religiosity). And King does a good job of portraying the gray in the the black and white. The characters' internal struggles with their own shortcomings and with their desires to find a place in which they feel they belong made it an incredibly interesting story, even as I was a bit let down by the climax.

I have a feeling I'm in the minority here when I say I was somewhat let down by the climax. And that's fine. We're all aware that our opinions are just that – personal preferences that are apt to be different from others'. And maybe my listening to it via audiobook instead of reading it via the more traditional method played a part. I certainly don't regret reading it, and would even go so far as to recommend it to others, if for no other reason than my own desire to hear someone else completely contradict my take on it.

My takeaway: My perception of a clear-cut black vs white situation is not necessarily mirrored in everyone else's moral compass, even if he or she seems like a good person – or a bad person, for that matter. And M-O-O-N spells so much more than just "moon."